Supreme CourtUnlikely allies team up to denounce today's Supreme Court Citizens United v. FEC ruling Submitted by Johnny Papagiannis on Thu, 01/21/2010 - 2:30pm.
Posted in: Citizens United v. FEC | Fair Elections Now Act | Mark McKinnon | Steve Hildebrand | Supreme Court
Today in The Daily Beast former Bush campaign operative, Mark McKinnon, and former Obama operative, Steve Hildebrand, have written an op-ed decrying today's Supreme Court decision in the Citizens United v. FEC case. The Philadelphia Inquirer Editorializes on Potential Influx of Corporate Money and Need for Fair Elections Now Act Submitted by Johnny Papagiannis on Mon, 11/09/2009 - 10:48am.
Posted in: Congress | Fair Elections Now Act | Philadelphia Inquirer | Rep. Bob Brady | Supreme Court
Yesterday The Philadelphia Inquirer ran an editorial on the pending Supreme Court case that could allow a huge flow of corporate money into our elections and calls on Rep. Bob Brady (D-Pa.) to move forward with the Fair Elections Now Act.
PUBLIC CAMPAIGN ACTION FUND PRAISES SOTOMAYOR ON HER CAMPAIGN FINANCE RECORD Submitted by Johnny Papagiannis on Mon, 07/13/2009 - 1:46pm.
Public Campaign Action Fund issued a press release today praising Supreme Court nominee, Judge Sonia Sotomayor, for her campaign finance record. High court agrees to hear WV judicial case Submitted by Adam Smith on Mon, 11/17/2008 - 6:03pm.
After a long delay, the U.S. Supreme Court announced on Friday it would hear an appeal from West Virginia concerning campaign finance and whether a state Supreme Court justice has the responsibility to recuse himself when a campaign contributor is affected.
Million Reasons Why Not Submitted by Katie Schlieper on Mon, 06/30/2008 - 4:41pm.
The editorial boards the Washington Post and the New York Times are none too pleased with the Supreme Court ruling against the Millionaire's Amendment provision in BCRA that provided rescue funds to candidates facing wealthy, self-financing opponents. Read on for excerpts from the editorials.
Supremely Disappointing Submitted by Katie Schlieper on Fri, 06/27/2008 - 12:33pm.
In a 5-4 split the Supreme Court delivered another very conservative campaign finance decision yesterday, ruling the "Millionaires' Amendment" provision of the Bipartisan Campaign Finance Reform (BRCA) law unconstitutional. While its impossible to say what the full implications of this decision are, its clear the Court is no friend to laws that seek to limit the influence of private money on our elections.
|
We're on the Web!
Paid for by... Tags
Abramoff(200)
campaign contributions(189)
Clean Elections(217)
Congress(437)
corruption(208)
lobbyists(166)
presidential race(147)
Public Financing(226)
scandal(155)
Texas(263)
Tom DeLay(757)
vote(158)
Popular Blog Posts
|
powered by Drupal