<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.campaignmoney.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Public Campaign Action Fund - millionaires amendment</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/taxonomy/term/809/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Supremely Disappointing</title>
 <link>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/06/27/supremely-disappointing</link>
 <description>In a 5-4 split the Supreme Court delivered &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=91941975&quot;&gt;another very conservative campaign finance decision &lt;/a&gt;yesterday, ruling the &amp;quot;Millionaires&amp;#39; Amendment&amp;quot; provision of the Bipartisan Campaign Finance Reform (BRCA) law unconstitutional.  While its impossible to say what the full implications of this decision are, its clear the Court is no friend to laws that seek to limit the influence of private money on our elections. &lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/06/27/supremely-disappointing&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog/2008/06/27/supremely-disappointing#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/bcra">BCRA</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/campaign-finance-reform">campaign finance reform</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/millionaires-amendment">millionaires amendment</category>
 <category domain="http://www.campaignmoney.org/blog-tags/supreme-court">Supreme Court</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Katie Schlieper</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">249448 at http://www.campaignmoney.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
